Friday, January 18, 2013

If you don't think they want all your guns...

THEN YOU HAVEN'T BEEN PAYING ATTENTION! Or did you miss what happened in the State of New York?
1.Lets see they rammed through a restrictions bill in the middle of the night behind closed doors.

2. the Journal News put up an interactive map up on their website with the names and addresses of every permit holder in two counties…

3.. since last week 2 of those homes have been broken into. One just yesterday. The breakers cracked 2 safes and walked off with a 3rd, all of the guns in those safes AND the permit paperwork for them. You really don’t want to know what I think should be done about that one.

Then there's the following....
4. That useless idiot of a Governor in Maryland is talking about trying to pass similar if not even more stringent laws in Maryland

5.Diana Feinstein that shrill dictatorial ‘do as I say, not as I do” shrew from California will be proposing what everyone who has leaked it or read it, has said is downright nasty and won’t just ban weapons to be sold yet but will also all those already legally out there., along with restrictions on magazines that hold 10 or more for any weapon.
That one passes and starts being enforced you can expect the dying to start.

6. What part of “shall not be infringed” do people not grok? I mean seriously? The point of the 2nd amendment was never about hunting. If you didn’t hunt back then you didn’t eat. It was never about sportsmanship..they didn’t DO competitions like we do now. Private individuals owned everything from pistols to cannons.  Our forefathers had just fought a mother fucking WAR to get out from under the heels of a Tyrannical king on the other side of the goddamn world and you don't think they figured it might happen again on our shores?  If this is the case, then YOU Sir[pronounced with a sneer so it comes out CUR] are dumber than I thought.

7. As for the asinine argument that some are bringing up in this debate that our forefathers couldn’t possibly have imagined the weapons we have today that fire rounds rapid fire singly or on full automatic?
Horseshit. the first gatling gun was invented and used in 1861.Less than 90 years after the passage of our constitution. One of our founding fathers Ben Franklin was an inventor and tinkerer and if you don’t think he didn’t see the advent of multishot weapons….*headshake*

 Here's a few examples of the multibarrel, multi round guns available in our founding fathers time..
The Nock Gun…a 7 barrel smooth bore musket invented in 1779.
The Pepperpot…a multibarrel pistol invented in the frelling 15th century.  Generally a 4 shot.
Many derringers or pocket pistols were multiple barrel in many cases, between 2-4.

8. The 2nd amendment is about defense from a tyrannical, oppressive or corrupt government. Our federal government and some states are certainly embodying the last 2 and are rapidly approaching the 1st. Ensuring the citizens have weapons parity as much as possible. That’s why it says “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” instead of the right of the militias. Don’t think a people can deal with a corrupt government if need be? Google The Battle of Athens, also called the McMinn County War.
The 2nd amendment is the only “gun permit” any of us need. The rest is unconstitutional bullshit. The only laws on the books for restrictions should be in the case of convicted felons not being allowed to own guns, and the option to make it a death penalty case if they use one in the commission of a crime. Whether anyone is actually harmed with that weapon or not.

We won't even get into what he's trying to do by intertwining this with medical care That one is a whole article on it's own.

Remember, TANSTAAFL and....
I now return you to  your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.

1 comment:

  1. Guns got stolen eh? hmmm, that might work better than a "tragic boating accident" since there would be a police report and all...just thinking out loud here...

    That interactive map got yanked, BTW. Looks like the newspaper is afraid of lawsuits by the former gun owners. It would serve them right.


Feel free to drop a line but try and keep it civil if it breaks into a heated discussion.