Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Nope the democrats don't want total power...

not at freaking all.....

Chuck syphilis for brains Schumer thinks he's qualified to rewrite the 1st amendment of the constitution?  He's not qualified to run a whorehouse. Hell that man isn't qualified to run his own life, let alone hold position in office.

According to the text of the proposed revision to James Madison's 1791 handiwork, sponsored by New Mexico Senator Tom Udall, the states and federal government would have the power to regulate the "raising and spending of money" through a wide range of means "to advance the fundamental principle of political equality for all."

Huh wait, WHAT?  So he wants to rewrite the Constitution so in the name of  "political equality for all"...we the people are supposed to trust this band of felonious mental incompetents currently in decide whats fair and what isn't?

“The First Amendment is sacred, but… the First Amendment is not absolute. By making it absolute, you actually make it less sacred to most Americans. We have to bring some balance to our political system,”  said the vainglorious, egotistical ass known as Chuck Schumer

here's the full text of the proposed amendment..

``Section 1. To advance the fundamental principle of political 
equality for all, and to protect the integrity of the legislative and 
electoral processes, Congress shall have power to regulate the raising 
and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to Federal 
elections, including through setting limits on--
            ``(1) the amount of contributions to candidates for 
        nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal office; 
            ``(2) the amount of funds that may be spent by, in support 
        of, or in opposition to such candidates.
    ``Section 2. To advance the fundamental principle of political 
equality for all, and to protect the integrity of the legislative and 
electoral processes, each State shall have power to regulate the 
raising and spending of money and in-kind equivalents with respect to 
State elections, including through setting limits on--
            ``(1) the amount of contributions to candidates for 
        nomination for election to, or for election to, State office; 
            ``(2) the amount of funds that may be spent by, in support 
        of, or in opposition to such candidates.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress the power to abridge the freedom of the press.
    ``Section 4. Congress and the States shall have power to implement 
and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.''.

Only one problem. As the article I link below points out...such an amendment would favor current sitting politicians almost exclusively. Making it difficult or next to/actually  impossible to, for anyone from the civilian sector to go up against sitting politicians. Be they dems or repubs.

I'll freely commend anyone and agree with anyone who says that this amendment has about a snowballs chance in hell...or a penniless man's chance in a whorehouse, of passing. However the fact Schumer and his buddies including Tom Udall among others,  has the unmitigated gall to even suggest such a thing should make you anyone currently sitting in office, especially dems but repubs too...anyone you want making decisions for you, over your life?  Because that is exactly where such an amendment leads. To an entrenched elite, that you can only get rid of through bloodshed.
 The same kind of fight our founding fathers fought to FREE us from the same kind of entrenched elite.  The same kind of fight they gave us, their descendants, The US Constitution to keep us from having to fight for as long as possible.  So...from their you think we're failing miserably?  From your own personal perspective...give it some deep thought, same question.  

My own answer?  I'd have thought that would be obvious.

Remember, TANSTAAFL and..........

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Government Run Amuck..

Ohh this is going to be satifying and emotionally draining because I'm about to get my mad on. Hold on to your heads and if you're offended by foul have been warned.

First lets talk about THIS STORY out of Carolina.
*headdsk* That's right boys and girls...The STATE is trying to tell Parents what they can and can not feed their kids. Are you fucking kidding me?! Uhmmm...nope. Sorry you overwheeningly prideful, power hungry small pricked pussies. NOWHERE in the Constitution is there an article granting you fuckers absolute power. Matter of fact in both The U.S. AND the various State Constitutions, it specifically says that what power is not specifically given over to the government to do, belongs to the people. I'm sorry but there's no mandate in any of the various State Constitutions that specifically gives the government the power to tell us what,where, when,how and who with. Sorry. The Constitutions were written to LIMIT the Governments power over the people...NOT the reverse!

More on this story-

Then there's this disturbing story out of North Carolina-Nope...schools shouldn't have that power. You don't get to do those kind of searches. The cops, MAYBE if there is sufficient probable cause or more importantly EVIDENCE That warrants it. Otherwise...searching any of the female members of MY family that way will get you hospitalized.

There's other stories but...I'll save those for separate posts later.

Remember TANSTAAFL and.......

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity

Children, lets talk about the Constitution.

The Constitution is our founding Document. It is the document that says the Government is of, for and BY the people and the minute it ceases to be so, We the People can behead that government and start over again.  Here's the problem. Too many don't understand that.  Either through ignorance not of their own doing, which is failing to be an excuse anymore with the proliferation of information on the internet.  Or willful ignorance. 

Those who don't understand or are being told /taught that our "rights" and more specifically the Bill of Rights, the 1st 10 amendments that are enunciated in, enumerated in and PROTECTED BY the Constitution, aren't rights at all. They are being told and taught that our rights [that which is due anyone by just claim, legal guarantee or moral principle.]are government granted or allowed privileges.  

This is from a woman's sons 4th grade homework assignment

   The 5th amendment which states the following...

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

but for this discussion I'm focusing on the bit about being compelled to be a witness against oneself aka the right against self incrimination. was held to be a privilege in an opinion of the US Supreme  in a decision in JUNE stated that the 5th Amendment was a privilege not a right.

So the right against self incrimination is not a right at all but a privilege granted by the government to be taken away at the whim of that same government? I don't think so junior. 

If you think this is insane, just wait til you hear what Chuck Schumer has in mind. 

Peoples rights are just that RIGHTS.  They aren't privileges that can be taken away as a parent takes away a misbehaving child toy, and rights are far from being toys. They are the guiding light, the principles, the.....natural laws of humanity if you will...that allow us to be free, independent beings. Beholden to nothing and no one but ourselves if we so choose. No one can take them away; unless you allow them to.  So why pray tell are we letting a government that has become a dictatorial commisariat elite and activist judges who like certain politicians would rewrite our founding documents to say what they mean; do so?    They should be held to the same standards as the rest of us. We need to jack these wild feral dogs in our governments  up short, and train them to remember who their masters are.

Remember, TANSTAAFL and..............

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Nigerian Girls kidnapped by muslim terrorists!

Shocking! Simply SHocking!  The fact this shit happens all day every day around the world not withstanding...
And of course we have the twitthher hashtag campaign for them and the campaign to put the name of a girl on your arm or a tshirt or some shit and wear it til the girls are returned.  Meh. I was going to give them some loving attention but a writer and man I'm fond of reading said it better than me.

Remember TANSTAAFL and...

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity

Monday, May 5, 2014

Cinco De Mayo! Yay! riiiiiiight?

*snort*   Happy holiday that was really only celebrated in ONE town in Mexico and not really observed else where. Until the day when the brewing companies sized up on it to drive up profits and created the massive drinking binge holiday of Cinco De Mayo as we know it today.  Most of you people  don't even know what it is you're supposed to be celebrating do you, you drunken fools?  Many retards think it's Mexican Independence Day. halfwits..THAT is in September. What you're celebrating  is the fucking brewing companies leading you around by the nose like lambs to the slaughter. Congrat U fucking lations.    *slow derisive clap*  

Remember TANSTAAFL  annnd

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Guns aer bad mmmkaaayyyy...NOT.

Guns are freakin supposes that had the intended victim of the crime in the following link not SHOT his former employee...then at the very least the intended victim would be quite DEAD.  It's entirely possible the attempted murderer might have gone on one of them mass killins you hear hyped about like their fucking sporting events in the news.

Moral of the story? Well golly gee wiz beav!  I guess guns really DO save lives after all! 


Remember TANSTAAFL and...

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.

Friday, May 2, 2014

A guest post...via "racsim" which don't exist.

Odd as that may seem to you my friends and readers. YEah a guest post. Written by a friend of mine. I may riff off it later. He may give me more material to edit in. It's a hell of a thought and right now I'm just too damn tired to do anything with it but post it. Enjoy germs and virii

Humans and their groups.. Humanity has been on the planet in it’s present for for about a quarter of a million years. That means that if you were to meet a person from 250,000 years ago he would be physically much the same as anyone walking the streets today. There would be no physical difference. Matter of fact...a neanderthal probably wouldn’t draw that much attention...particularly at a tractor pull..but that’s another story. As i was saying...Physically we look the same now as we did a quarter million years ago. How bout our minds? How quickly do our minds change? The deep roots of our consciousness? The crankshaft and gears of our ID? Just guessing...I’d say not much. Probably today’s mental machinery is pretty much the same as it was then. Now consider this. For all that time...people dealt with other people retail. People lived in small groups. Possibly twenty to fify. Call it clans perhaps? These small groups were then subordinate to a larger grouping...possibly a hundred or so. (Side note...consider the Army. Squads, fire teams and the company. the boys that get stuff done...everyone else supports THEIR mission) So...for a quarter million years the ruts are worn into our minds that the proper number of people to deal with...isn’t very many. A few hundred, a few thousand, a million...MORE? Well that’s just insane. Literally insane. Ever notice that the over all intelligence of a group DECREASES as the size increases? It's an inverse relationship. Of course the stupidist is the federal Government. Cant’ get any stupider than that. And that’s the problem.

"Further along with that concept is the idea the individuals are getting more and more powerful. Consider a modern day redneck...say..Mark Wandry with his toys. He could take out a squad of cavalary of a hundred years ago...or a company of pike men a thousand years ago...or a whole army of swords men...two thousand years ago...all by his little lonesome" 
Elon musk is more powerful today than, say, a small european COUNTRY was prior to WWI.

Remember TANSTAAFL and..

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity


Thursday, May 1, 2014

"Freedom of Speech" or is it really anymore?

Buckle up it's gonna be a bumpy ride,and I really don't give FLYING FUCK what anyone thinks of this one.

Everyday in the news and across the internet, the publishing world etc, examples that Freedom of Speech is dead, or on it's way it's way to dying.  Now it's freedom of speech for thee but not for me. Or you can say freedom of speech for me but not for thee. Pick whichever version makes you happy.

Freedom of speech, but only so long as it's politically correct, officially approved by the committee speech. Go against the borg gestalt and the gestalt will actively destroy you or make a damn good attempt at it. 

How can I say such things? Open your fucking eyes and ears people.  Here's the most recent example. An NBA team owner makes offensive comments.  So he's been banned from the NBA and is being fined $2.5million dollars by the league. How did this come to light?  Oh I don't know...maybe that supposed mistress he was supposedly fucking on the side that was recording everything he said, decided there was more money in controversy and writing a best selling memoir.

Or maybe it's because she's being SUED by the wife of 50yrs of  Donald Sterling, for the return of an almost $2million dollar duplex, a range rover, a ferrari and 2 Bentleys that sterling bought for his supposed mistress. Personally I wonder if he can even get it up with viagra.  I also doubt his heart would approve of the strain

Which as I said, tells me this is about money.

Then there was what Cliven Bundy said. Not even gonna bother to link to the news stories and such in this one. If you haven't heard of this one you've been living under a rock.  Note in his case whether what he said is "racist" or not is fucking irrelevant. The fact that the government sent out more fire power for a rancher who is refusing to kowtow to a government run amok, that is the relevant story. or as a lady on youtube put it...

Then there was a question in the music world of is Avril Lavignes latest video racist and insensitive

No, by the way it's FUCKING ENTERTAINMENT YOU ASSHATS get a grip.
It's not racist...hell the fans of hello kitty and anime fucking WALLOW in the goddamn "stereotypes", so what makes you so fucking special to be able to call this insensitive? Go pound sand you twatwaffles.

And then there was the brouhaha's over the Hugo Awards..

Starting with Jonathon Ross being asked and accepting to host. Here's one take on it..

here's another take, by Neil Gaiman..

Because of a bunch of vocal attacks on him..Ross said fuck it, and withdrew.

Then there was the Tempest in an Tea Cup over the nominations. 

HEre's a  lonnng post about it by one of the receivers  of vitriol because he DARED to ask his fans to vote to get one of his books on the nominations list. Something that is apparently fine for others if they're of the right political slant[read leftist and even John Scalzi darling of the set will say  he's done it himself and I HATE Scalzi's politics] but is an abomination if your a libertarian, a conservative or even a slightly right leaning centrist.

My response to both those "controversies"?  Well to them that is stirring the poisonous brew with a spoon of concentrated hatred I say...get over yourselves.

Ahh then of course Larry previous made INTERNATIONAL news with his response to Alex Daily MacFarlane's whining demand  that  she wants "an end* to the default of binary gender in science fiction stories."  You ran read that miserable vomitous mass here:

Or you can follow the link to it from Larry's response to it and the guardian article from the following post. Note if you go this route through prepared for a LOT of reading. This one is link heavy and for good reason.

Yes for those that apparently haven't felt the heavy *smack* of the clue by four..I am a fan of Larry's and agree with every goddamn word he's said about ALL the aforementioned literary whining, childishly stupid tempests in teacups.  Larry first response was a scathing reply that perhaps a good STORY  should come before filling some, race, gender, social justice quota in books.  For which he got steaming pile of camel dung tossed at him.

Then there was this a bunch of bullshit from Dartmouth College..
This time, the fracas is over a fundraiser for cardiac care that the Phi Delta Alpha fraternity and the Alpha Phi sorority had planned to jointly sponsor, reports Campus Reform.
Problems arose because a single student, junior Daniela Hernandez, was offended by the party’s theme of “Phiesta.”

Now while I agree with part of her reasoning....

" “the Americanization of Cinco de Mayo and its construction as a drinking holiday in the United States, cultural appropriation and the inappropriate usage of cultural clothing, and the exploitation of groups of people and cultures for the sake of business opportunities”—and, apparently, charity opportunities."  

It was the monetization, hell a commercialization of a "holiday" that most of mexico didn't bother to celebrate so the beer companies can sell more beer.   However......

I realized upon further reading that Ms Hernandez  ain't got much love for the school either...

"It was sadly unsurprising that a culturally-themed party was seen as a casual venture for such a privileged institution such as Dartmouth,” Hernandez proclaimed." 

And yet.......?
Hmm I wonder?   A query for you Ms Hernandez. If you  really have that much disdain for such a "privileged institution";  then WHAT in all the multiple fucking levels of hell are you doing there young lady?  If you really have that much disdain...why are you not going to school? or some school with a less than "privileged" background ethos. Like say a local junior college or a STATE college.   Or even.*gasp* dare I say of the online degree factories?  My inquiring mind would kinda like to know the answer you deceitful dimwit.  One also wonders if you're paying all your own freight for school, in which case I applaud you for that at least.  Or if you got a scholarship for that school?  Inquiring minds want to know..
Phi Delt president Taylor Catchcart explained why the Greek organizations folded.
“We felt that the possibility of offending even one member of the Dartmouth community was not worth the potential benefits of having the fundraiser,” he said." 

Meaning you didn't have the BALLS to stand up to one vociferous, hypocritical jackass?  Wow.

I won't even bother with the whining from a teenager about McDonalds happy meals.

So, do we really have freedom of speech anymore? Some days I wonder

Remember TANSTAAFL and..

I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.