Was watching The Five yesterday. Some predictions
Bob Beckel predicted Obama would win re election and that the tea party candidates for congress were gonna get their asses kick.
Kimberly Guilfoyle predicts that the Supreme Court will declare Obama Care unconstitutional
Andrea Tantaros oddly enough thinks Bob is probably right and that Obama will win, but by a razor thin margin. She also thinks most of the conservative/Tea Party candidates for congress will win. Basically a sweep.
Greg Gutfeld also suggests that Obama might win.
I can't remember what Eric Bolling had to say.
Damn I hope the predictions about Obama winning are wrong. 4 more years of that son of a bitch and we're going to end up another Russia...or Brazil
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Ahhh gun grabbing control nazi's
Cushite Minmitar In my opinion things have to get worse, much worse, before it will get any better. I had a conversation with a friend the other day, during the convo we both had an "Aha!" moment. Why not give the crazies exactly what they want "All the guns they could ever want". Scrap every gun law on the books and then sit back and wait about six months. I guarantee that every, and I mean every American would be screaming for gun prohibition. This sounds harsh I know, but it comes to a point that I can't see much other option; no matter how many deaths, nothing changes. Both the BC and VPC and many other groups are losing supporters left and right. Not because these people are suddenly pro gun, but because it come to a point that we are like, "Why bother, nothing is going to change, so to heck with this". Take the original "Gunguys" website for example. They were bloggin and posting for ages, then one day, boom!, Nothing! They closed down. And I believe it was because they are thinking as many of us do now; "Whats the point, no one listens". Sorry for such a downer post...10 hours ago ·
Coalition to Stop Gun Violence You're entitled to your pessimism, but we assure you things WILL change. We do not sense any lack of determination in the gun violence prevention movement. Just the opposite. Mayors Against Illegal Guns has added an invaluable element to the movement, bringing municipal officials and law enforcement leaders to the forefront on this issue, and gun violence survivors are organized like never before. Is it going to be a tough slog? Yep. Just like every other worthwhile cause in this country ever was. But we WILL win.10 hours ago · ·
1
John Donnaruma The NRA says that, while trying to prevent law enforcement from doing their jobs enforcing gun control laws and fully funding the ATF.about an hour ago ·
and my reply:
For those who think taking the guns out of the hands of citizens is a good idea. I point you at 2 places. Europe, specifically England, where when the guns were taken from the citizens and guns were banned period...the really bad ones still had the guns and those that couldn't get them just switched weapons. If someone is intent on doing CRIME, You can NOT stop them through legislation. They WILL find a way. And now in England they are talking about banning *facepalm* KNIVES, idiots.
On the opposite end of the scale..I point you to a town named Kennesaw, Georgia. Where nigh on about 30yrs ago a law was passed that made it MANDATORY for all heads of household to own, maintain and know how to USE a gun. At the time it was a town of about 5000, now it's 6x that size. At the time...crime period, dropped to almost nothing over night. At the time the law was passed places and organizations similar to CSGV said that neighbor would end up shooting neighbor, kids would be shot for just "bein well....kids" they renamed the place GUNTOWN USA. Guess what boys and girls. In that time not only has the population grown to 6x the size it was when the ordinance was passed but crime is still LESS than half of what it was when the ordinance was passed. Oh and as far as I know[at least the last time I bothered to check a couple years ago] not a single murder. That is all...good day.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Twas the Night Before Christmas[UN-PC version]
Twas the night before Christmas
and all through the house,
Everyone felt shitty.
Even the Mouse.
With Mom at the whorehouse
And Dad smoking grass
I'd just settled down
For a nice piece of ass.
When out on the lawn
I heard such a clatter.
I sprang from my piece
To see what was the matter.
Then up on the roof
Came the smell of deer shit
I knew in a heart beat
It must be Saint Nick.
He dropped down the chimney
like a bat out of hell.
I knew by the cussing
that the fucker had fell.
He stuffed all our stockings
With pretzels and beer
And a big rubber dick
For my brother the queer.
He shot up the chimney
With a thunderous fart.
The son of a bitch
Blew the chimney apart!
He swore and he cursed
as he rode out of site
"Piss on you all!
It's been a hell of a night!"
and all through the house,
Everyone felt shitty.
Even the Mouse.
With Mom at the whorehouse
And Dad smoking grass
I'd just settled down
For a nice piece of ass.
When out on the lawn
I heard such a clatter.
I sprang from my piece
To see what was the matter.
Then up on the roof
Came the smell of deer shit
I knew in a heart beat
It must be Saint Nick.
He dropped down the chimney
like a bat out of hell.
I knew by the cussing
that the fucker had fell.
He stuffed all our stockings
With pretzels and beer
And a big rubber dick
For my brother the queer.
He shot up the chimney
With a thunderous fart.
The son of a bitch
Blew the chimney apart!
He swore and he cursed
as he rode out of site
"Piss on you all!
It's been a hell of a night!"
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Ahh politics
Reading various posts in the last hour or so, while sitting here listening to The Zac Brown Band..
I've come to a conclusion. As much as it annoys the hell out of me to say it..whoever manages to get the GOP nod after the Republican convention will get my vote. GOD it makes me highly nauseous to speak those words. I'll have to choke back the bile though and do it..because as some have said, at this point ANYONE of them is a better option than 4 more years of Obama. Frankly I've got no use for any of them at this point.
Perry? Perry needs to get his ass back here to Texas and do the goddamn job we elected him for.
Bachmann-she's the only one at this point remotely palatable to me, even if she doesn't 'have experience".
Newt? Newt is a long time career politician whose held his seat for decades. He's a part of the fucking problem.
Ron Paul? Same problem as Newt. Plus his ideas on the military and foreign policy front will get us into another war. Isolationism is not gonna make things better boys and girls. It only invites the barbarians to come knocking at the front door of our house instead of the tent we're camping in elsewhere. That falls under the heading of "bad things" Although I like a lot of what he intends/espouses domestically. Not all mind you but quite a bit of it.
Romney? Romney is fucking Obama Lite. I don't like Obama. So pray tell, what the fuck makes you think I'd find Romney any more palatable?
Hunstman? As I've said elsewhere and said repeatedly; the second that far left, hissy fit throwing left loon fucktard Chris Matthews calls you the "sanest candidate in the room", YOU SIR cease to be a viable fucking candidate.
Santorum? Honestly I haven't payed much attention to him, maybe I should for the next couple of debates. However, don't hold your breath til you turn blue in the face, expecting me to come back with a nice opinion of him.
That is all. I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity
I've come to a conclusion. As much as it annoys the hell out of me to say it..whoever manages to get the GOP nod after the Republican convention will get my vote. GOD it makes me highly nauseous to speak those words. I'll have to choke back the bile though and do it..because as some have said, at this point ANYONE of them is a better option than 4 more years of Obama. Frankly I've got no use for any of them at this point.
Perry? Perry needs to get his ass back here to Texas and do the goddamn job we elected him for.
Bachmann-she's the only one at this point remotely palatable to me, even if she doesn't 'have experience".
Newt? Newt is a long time career politician whose held his seat for decades. He's a part of the fucking problem.
Ron Paul? Same problem as Newt. Plus his ideas on the military and foreign policy front will get us into another war. Isolationism is not gonna make things better boys and girls. It only invites the barbarians to come knocking at the front door of our house instead of the tent we're camping in elsewhere. That falls under the heading of "bad things" Although I like a lot of what he intends/espouses domestically. Not all mind you but quite a bit of it.
Romney? Romney is fucking Obama Lite. I don't like Obama. So pray tell, what the fuck makes you think I'd find Romney any more palatable?
Hunstman? As I've said elsewhere and said repeatedly; the second that far left, hissy fit throwing left loon fucktard Chris Matthews calls you the "sanest candidate in the room", YOU SIR cease to be a viable fucking candidate.
Santorum? Honestly I haven't payed much attention to him, maybe I should for the next couple of debates. However, don't hold your breath til you turn blue in the face, expecting me to come back with a nice opinion of him.
That is all. I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Lets talk edumacation.[that's EDUCATION]
Our school system is...how to put this delicately....nah, screw delicate! Our skewl system is Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition. Fucked up by liberal feel good policies, and the[I believe] deep dark progressive agenda of the progressives to turn our school into factories that are good for but one thing. Churning out masses of mindless automatons who can't think critically, and don't question authority.See if they can't think they can't get the higher paying jobs..therefore they get the low end ones and end up on welfare. Dependent on the government on survival and therefore obedient to that government's demands, proclamations and rules. Here is yet another glaring example of the idiots teaching today's youth and their entitlement mentality.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/when-an-adult-took-standardized-tests-forced-on-kids/2011/12/05/gIQApTDuUO_blog.html
Now I'm going to say something I've said repeatedly in the past. The tests are a crock. Why? Because the kids are being taught TO the test. IOW what they need for the test and not a hell of a lot else. Rote memorization, not learning to learn and think critically. Is that really teaching kids to learn? Or just teaching them to parrot what they've been told?
“I have a wide circle of friends in various professions. Since taking the test, I’ve detailed its contents as best I can to many of them, particularly the math section, which does more than its share of shoving students in our system out of school and on to the street. Not a single one of them said that the math I described was necessary in their profession"
Yes dude but how many of them are scientists in the fields of physics, geometrics etc etc where those maths are fundamental to what they do? You do realize that back in the pioneer days that by the time Kids got finished with what we'd call "intermediate" or middle school now, could read well, understand what they were reading, argue critically about it, and on the math side had studied up to Trigonometry and understood it because they used it in every day life?
“It might be argued that I’ve been out of school too long, that if I’d actually been in the 10th grade prior to taking the test, the material would have been fresh. But doesn’t that miss the point? A test that can determine a student’s future life chances should surely relate in some practical way to the requirements of life. I can’t see how that could possibly be true of the test I took."
Okay I actually kind of agree with this point. That being said..I also hated math, and still do..with a purple passion. Flunked PRE Algebra for christs sake. On the flip side I did very well with Geometry. Go figure. Yes kids have to be taught stuff that's practical..but that doesn't do a hell of a lot of good in my own not so humble opinion if they're not taught a love of learning. To WANT to expand their minds...not just because they should to get ahead in life but because it's FUN! I didn't get that in school..I got it at home. My parents weren't too hard on me about my math skills..my mom sucked at it too. so she didn't push me so hard there. What they taught me though was to love to read. Read ANYTHING. From the time I COULD read, I read everything I could get my hands on..whether the liberal progressive retarded bureaucrats that run our schools would have considered it "age appropriate" or not.. I devoured books. I started reading and comprehending fully Tom Clancy novels by the time I was 12. I consumed any history book I got my grubby little paws on. Which leads me to an amusing tale.
In high school, Junior year...I got so BORED with most of my classes that I used to sleep through my history class part of the time and the teacher allowed it. WHY? He knew , that I knew the material in the book forwards and backwards.. Because by the time the first couple of weeks of class were past..I'd read the ENTIRE textbook! and grokked it. Don't get me wrong..I would always go back and skim what we were reading at that point just to keep it fresh in my mind. But the teacher didn't object to my napping either . You know where I spent most of my lunch breaks of my high school career? In one of the 2 main libraries on either side of the building..reading. I'd learned my lesson well...I loved and still do love to read. But I digress....
“If I’d been required to take those two tests when I was a 10th grader, my life would almost certainly have been very different. I’d have been told I wasn’t ‘college material,’ would probably have believed it, and looked for work appropriate for the level of ability that the test said I had. "
Hence proving my point for me about the standardized tests.
Winerip writes: “As of last night, 658 principals around the state (New York) had signed a letter — 488 of them from Long Island, where the insurrection began — protesting the use of students’ test scores to evaluate teachers’ and principals’ performance"
Uhmm...if the students aren't actually learning and understanding the material, thereby allowing them to advance on merit..instead of just passing the buck like the school systems seem to do..then what earthly fucking good are the teachers failing to get the kids doing what I stated in bold? Seriously?
"A fourth principal, Mario Fernandez, called the evaluation process a product of “ludicrous, shallow thinking. They’re expecting a tornado to go through a junkyard and have a brand new Mercedes pop up.”
Uhmmm...NO lady. We're EXPECTING YOU TO DO YOUR GODDAMN JOB! If you can't do it...learn to. If you won't do it..walk and don't ever come back.
Oh by the way if you read the whole thing..only a DC paper could take a piece on the education system and turn it into an anti corporate rant...
I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity; and remember...TANSTAAFL.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/when-an-adult-took-standardized-tests-forced-on-kids/2011/12/05/gIQApTDuUO_blog.html
Now I'm going to say something I've said repeatedly in the past. The tests are a crock. Why? Because the kids are being taught TO the test. IOW what they need for the test and not a hell of a lot else. Rote memorization, not learning to learn and think critically. Is that really teaching kids to learn? Or just teaching them to parrot what they've been told?
“I have a wide circle of friends in various professions. Since taking the test, I’ve detailed its contents as best I can to many of them, particularly the math section, which does more than its share of shoving students in our system out of school and on to the street. Not a single one of them said that the math I described was necessary in their profession"
Yes dude but how many of them are scientists in the fields of physics, geometrics etc etc where those maths are fundamental to what they do? You do realize that back in the pioneer days that by the time Kids got finished with what we'd call "intermediate" or middle school now, could read well, understand what they were reading, argue critically about it, and on the math side had studied up to Trigonometry and understood it because they used it in every day life?
“It might be argued that I’ve been out of school too long, that if I’d actually been in the 10th grade prior to taking the test, the material would have been fresh. But doesn’t that miss the point? A test that can determine a student’s future life chances should surely relate in some practical way to the requirements of life. I can’t see how that could possibly be true of the test I took."
Okay I actually kind of agree with this point. That being said..I also hated math, and still do..with a purple passion. Flunked PRE Algebra for christs sake. On the flip side I did very well with Geometry. Go figure. Yes kids have to be taught stuff that's practical..but that doesn't do a hell of a lot of good in my own not so humble opinion if they're not taught a love of learning. To WANT to expand their minds...not just because they should to get ahead in life but because it's FUN! I didn't get that in school..I got it at home. My parents weren't too hard on me about my math skills..my mom sucked at it too. so she didn't push me so hard there. What they taught me though was to love to read. Read ANYTHING. From the time I COULD read, I read everything I could get my hands on..whether the liberal progressive retarded bureaucrats that run our schools would have considered it "age appropriate" or not.. I devoured books. I started reading and comprehending fully Tom Clancy novels by the time I was 12. I consumed any history book I got my grubby little paws on. Which leads me to an amusing tale.
In high school, Junior year...I got so BORED with most of my classes that I used to sleep through my history class part of the time and the teacher allowed it. WHY? He knew , that I knew the material in the book forwards and backwards.. Because by the time the first couple of weeks of class were past..I'd read the ENTIRE textbook! and grokked it. Don't get me wrong..I would always go back and skim what we were reading at that point just to keep it fresh in my mind. But the teacher didn't object to my napping either . You know where I spent most of my lunch breaks of my high school career? In one of the 2 main libraries on either side of the building..reading. I'd learned my lesson well...I loved and still do love to read. But I digress....
“If I’d been required to take those two tests when I was a 10th grader, my life would almost certainly have been very different. I’d have been told I wasn’t ‘college material,’ would probably have believed it, and looked for work appropriate for the level of ability that the test said I had. "
Hence proving my point for me about the standardized tests.
Winerip writes: “As of last night, 658 principals around the state (New York) had signed a letter — 488 of them from Long Island, where the insurrection began — protesting the use of students’ test scores to evaluate teachers’ and principals’ performance"
Uhmm...if the students aren't actually learning and understanding the material, thereby allowing them to advance on merit..instead of just passing the buck like the school systems seem to do..then what earthly fucking good are the teachers failing to get the kids doing what I stated in bold? Seriously?
"One of those school principals, Winerip says, is Bernard Kaplan. Kaplan runs one of the highest-achieving schools in the state, but is required to attend 10 training sessions.
“It’s education by humiliation,” Kaplan said. “I’ve never seen teachers and principals so degraded.”
Carol Burris, named the 2010 Educator of the Year by the School Administrators Association of New York State, has to attend those 10 training sessions."
"A fourth principal, Mario Fernandez, called the evaluation process a product of “ludicrous, shallow thinking. They’re expecting a tornado to go through a junkyard and have a brand new Mercedes pop up.”
Uhmmm...NO lady. We're EXPECTING YOU TO DO YOUR GODDAMN JOB! If you can't do it...learn to. If you won't do it..walk and don't ever come back.
Oh by the way if you read the whole thing..only a DC paper could take a piece on the education system and turn it into an anti corporate rant...
I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity; and remember...TANSTAAFL.
Monday, December 5, 2011
Dumb? Evil? REALLY?
Lord gimme strength. Wait..don't watch the video yet. skip the link for now and read what she's saying and my responses to some of it. really entertainly..MIND NUMBINGLY brain damaged shit she's saying.
"No I DON'T support the current administration,. I don't support the wars, but I also don't support the troops. Uhmmm I reject nationalism. I reject blind patriotism; and uhmm I reject everything that the phrase 'support the troops' in 2011...stands for."
Wow! Okay she does realize that the military doesn't JUST break shit and kill people. Our military also help the countries we end up invading REBUILD. Rebuild their infrastructure...and on OUR dime. Also when a natural disaster hits anywhere it's generally a US military ship or group of ships, or airlift, that's first or among the first to show the fuck up and render aid? No somehow I think that fact has alluded her.
Wait..it gets better.
"...many of the people in the military don't actually know what they're doing. They THINK that they're helping..uh..us. They think that they're protecting their country. Well uhm..I really don't think that's a valid 'excuse' anymore. They should know what they're fighting for, they should know what they're doing. And you know ignorance isn't going to bring someones family member back. Ignorance isn't going to change the fact that since WW2, 90% of the casualties..uhm..in..you know, in U.S. warfare has been unarmed civilians. It's not going to change that. It's not going to change the fact we've killed over a million Iraqi people..."
Sigh..REALLY liberty chick? Do tell. Look at her SOURCES on her video, she lists them below the vid.
Now lets look at a site that repudiates that crap.
Just a quote from that one.
"Glen Reinsford attacks the moral corruption of Iraq Body Count:
Okay there's more to this but let me just interrupt this diatribe to say..what WE'RE fighting for? Honey I don't see YOUR bony ass out on the front lines defending our country. Or "killing unarmed civilians". What's this "we" shit white woman....now I return to the diatribe
"There's no excuse for them to think that they're fighting for our freedoms when the truth is they're fighting for Exxon Mobil and British Petroleum, and Haliburton, and [something] and root, that there's no excuse. they don't have that excuse anymore."
Wow she really is a darling far left moonbat liberal isn't she? there's a little more to this part of it but I'll skip ahead to her second category that people who join the military fall under.
"They're evil. Uhh.that's a large possibility. I mean uhm if you were a serial killer, what better job to have than a job where you chop someones head off and get paid for it. To have a job where you're given a badge of honor..uhm,mm this is true..where you're given a badge of honor..uhm..for uhm..stabbing someone to death. Uhh who did nothing. Uhm..that would be a perfect job. if you were a serial killer, if you loved violence, the perfect place for you to find employment would be the U.S. military. So you're either dumb, you couldn't get a real job, you were backed in a corner, you had to pay child support, you had to join the military to get money. Uhmm..or you're evil., and you realize what you are doing and you like it. "
Holy SHIT! Nope..this bitch doesn't have a superiority complex...NOT AT ALL. Wow! Do any of my many military friends with degrees and MULTIPLE degrees/Ph. D's, in hard sciences, CPA's mathematics and other useful fields of endeavor want to go disabuse her of that notion? No? Don't want to waste your time verbally banging your head against a brick wall? Hmmm................can't say as I blame you my friends. I love the fact she says it's a large "possibility" that some of you are serial killers. Anyone want to raise their hands and admit to killing lots of people for the FUN of it and the power rush involved? No? *sarcasm ON* Come on boys..I know many of you love to kill people for shits and giggles. Admit it! Oh and next time..send me high end electronics as friendship tokens...not body parts and womens/ childrens clothing and jewelry. Okay? Thanks. Doofuses. *sarcasm OFF*
She thinks people join the military to MAKE money? Does she have any concept of how much our lads and lasses in uniform MAKE? Or how they live? Or just how highly educated most of our military is? I doubt it myself.
*chinscratch* Or for that matter..WHY most of you boys and girls join? No...she said at the beginning of this little font of stupidity that she doesn't believe in nationalism or patriotism...so that answers THAT question.
"Or that you realize that what you're doing is wrong and that you're morally compromised. Uh, that's the 3rd option. I believe that a lot of people fall under that option, but you know that's not an excuse either. I'm not going to support your position of being 'morally compromised'...."
*headdesk, headdesk, headdesk*
"I don't like living in a culture where we basically...kiss these peoples asses for joining an organization that has killed over a million innocent people. Uh it doesn't make any sense. To me that's disgusting. And I don't care if you think if this video is offensive I think the fact that someone would join an organization that has killed over a million innocent people simply because they want money, or they want the..the..the glory of having their ass kissed and everyone telling them 'oh thank you so much your a hero'..I think THAT'S offensive. I think that that's wrong. I think thats morally repugnant."
Well at least she's consistent, no?
Sigh..you know what? I love you guys I REALLY do. However I can't sit through and listen to/watch this fecal matter yet again. I feel my IQ dropping rapidly as I sit here and listen to it , so I'm going to stop. You can watch the rest of it on your own. Me? I'm going to shut this dumb shit off and salvage what's left of my higher brain functions, and critical thinking ability.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.
"No I DON'T support the current administration,. I don't support the wars, but I also don't support the troops. Uhmmm I reject nationalism. I reject blind patriotism; and uhmm I reject everything that the phrase 'support the troops' in 2011...stands for."
Wow! Okay she does realize that the military doesn't JUST break shit and kill people. Our military also help the countries we end up invading REBUILD. Rebuild their infrastructure...and on OUR dime. Also when a natural disaster hits anywhere it's generally a US military ship or group of ships, or airlift, that's first or among the first to show the fuck up and render aid? No somehow I think that fact has alluded her.
Wait..it gets better.
"...many of the people in the military don't actually know what they're doing. They THINK that they're helping..uh..us. They think that they're protecting their country. Well uhm..I really don't think that's a valid 'excuse' anymore. They should know what they're fighting for, they should know what they're doing. And you know ignorance isn't going to bring someones family member back. Ignorance isn't going to change the fact that since WW2, 90% of the casualties..uhm..in..you know, in U.S. warfare has been unarmed civilians. It's not going to change that. It's not going to change the fact we've killed over a million Iraqi people..."
Sigh..REALLY liberty chick? Do tell. Look at her SOURCES on her video, she lists them below the vid.
Now lets look at a site that repudiates that crap.
Just a quote from that one.
"Glen Reinsford attacks the moral corruption of Iraq Body Count:
- "These ordinary Iraqis were victims of senseless violence. Were they killed by an American bomb or a Saudi suicide bomber? Hint: IraqBodyCount doesn't want you to know."
- "enter IraqBodyCount.net, an anti-war organization that was envisioned even before the Iraq War began, with the heady ambition of documenting each and every victim of American aggression in order to turn public opinion against the action to remove Saddam ... Somewhere along the way, however, the harsh reality began to sink in that America was acting as no other country in history has ever acted to prevent civilian casualties in warfare. As a matter of fact, more American troops have been killed in the conflict than have civilians been killed by Americans. Americans are literally taking casualties to prevent casualties on the part of Iraqi civilians. Though mere mortals might be prompted to reconsider their prejudices at this point, the folks at IraqBodyCount reacted by quietly changing their mission to include the victims of terrorists - the very people that the Americans are trying to stop. Their dubious body-count even includes members of the Iraqi security forces, who are part of the coalition. ... Another big problem with IraqBodyCount's statistics is that it even includes the terrorists themselves. ... In fact, if you .. browse their database, you'll notice that the tables are conspicuously missing a column - the party responsible for each attack. There's a reason for this, as we discovered when we analyzed each incident to answer this question. It turns out that the vast majority of civilian deaths are caused by Islamic terrorists, and that very few are from American bombs and bullets. This is because (unlike the terrorists) the Americans aren't in Iraq to kill civilians. ... In 2006, the number of civilians who died in encounters between the Americans and the terrorists was about four times lower than the number of U.S. troops killed. In short, civilians in Iraq aren't dying from the war. They are being murdered by Islamic terrorists."
Okay there's more to this but let me just interrupt this diatribe to say..what WE'RE fighting for? Honey I don't see YOUR bony ass out on the front lines defending our country. Or "killing unarmed civilians". What's this "we" shit white woman....now I return to the diatribe
"There's no excuse for them to think that they're fighting for our freedoms when the truth is they're fighting for Exxon Mobil and British Petroleum, and Haliburton, and [something] and root, that there's no excuse. they don't have that excuse anymore."
Wow she really is a darling far left moonbat liberal isn't she? there's a little more to this part of it but I'll skip ahead to her second category that people who join the military fall under.
"They're evil. Uhh.that's a large possibility. I mean uhm if you were a serial killer, what better job to have than a job where you chop someones head off and get paid for it. To have a job where you're given a badge of honor..uhm,mm this is true..where you're given a badge of honor..uhm..for uhm..stabbing someone to death. Uhh who did nothing. Uhm..that would be a perfect job. if you were a serial killer, if you loved violence, the perfect place for you to find employment would be the U.S. military. So you're either dumb, you couldn't get a real job, you were backed in a corner, you had to pay child support, you had to join the military to get money. Uhmm..or you're evil., and you realize what you are doing and you like it. "
Holy SHIT! Nope..this bitch doesn't have a superiority complex...NOT AT ALL. Wow! Do any of my many military friends with degrees and MULTIPLE degrees/Ph. D's, in hard sciences, CPA's mathematics and other useful fields of endeavor want to go disabuse her of that notion? No? Don't want to waste your time verbally banging your head against a brick wall? Hmmm................can't say as I blame you my friends. I love the fact she says it's a large "possibility" that some of you are serial killers. Anyone want to raise their hands and admit to killing lots of people for the FUN of it and the power rush involved? No? *sarcasm ON* Come on boys..I know many of you love to kill people for shits and giggles. Admit it! Oh and next time..send me high end electronics as friendship tokens...not body parts and womens/ childrens clothing and jewelry. Okay? Thanks. Doofuses. *sarcasm OFF*
She thinks people join the military to MAKE money? Does she have any concept of how much our lads and lasses in uniform MAKE? Or how they live? Or just how highly educated most of our military is? I doubt it myself.
*chinscratch* Or for that matter..WHY most of you boys and girls join? No...she said at the beginning of this little font of stupidity that she doesn't believe in nationalism or patriotism...so that answers THAT question.
"Or that you realize that what you're doing is wrong and that you're morally compromised. Uh, that's the 3rd option. I believe that a lot of people fall under that option, but you know that's not an excuse either. I'm not going to support your position of being 'morally compromised'...."
*headdesk, headdesk, headdesk*
"I don't like living in a culture where we basically...kiss these peoples asses for joining an organization that has killed over a million innocent people. Uh it doesn't make any sense. To me that's disgusting. And I don't care if you think if this video is offensive I think the fact that someone would join an organization that has killed over a million innocent people simply because they want money, or they want the..the..the glory of having their ass kissed and everyone telling them 'oh thank you so much your a hero'..I think THAT'S offensive. I think that that's wrong. I think thats morally repugnant."
Well at least she's consistent, no?
Sigh..you know what? I love you guys I REALLY do. However I can't sit through and listen to/watch this fecal matter yet again. I feel my IQ dropping rapidly as I sit here and listen to it , so I'm going to stop. You can watch the rest of it on your own. Me? I'm going to shut this dumb shit off and salvage what's left of my higher brain functions, and critical thinking ability.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled inanity and insanity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)